As this significant interest from policymakers and politicians intensifies, it is worth remembering two things.
Firstly, that AI will not and should not replace highly trained medical professionals, but rather can empower them to further help their patients and focus their care. Many processes and pathways are not fully automatable, and arguably nor should they be. Patients want to know that there is a human doctor overseeing their care. What AI will do, though, is change the ways in which we work – so we need to be ready.
Secondly, we need to get the basics right first, if AI is to be in any way the revolutionary change which many have professed it will be. It is no good having a sophisticated AI tool at your disposal if your patients miss their appointments because they receive invitations via letters which arrive through their door after the date of their appointment. It will not help your working lives to have advanced auto-contouring or image analysis tools if it still takes your computer 20 minutes to turn on in the morning. And it is no good expecting the NHS to undertake an enormous programme of change if it does not have enough staff – both clinical and non-clinical – to make that change happen.
The RCR speaks regularly with NHS England, the Department of Health and with other relevant organisations to share our recommendations and to shape AI policy. This has included meetings with senior government officials in England as well as the devolved nations. Recently, we submitted evidence for the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Inquiry on Artificial Intelligence governance. We will continue to put forward the views of our Fellows and members in these fora as we seek to work collaboratively with government and the NHS on this increasingly important topic.